P12-L07 · P12 · P12-M02
Disclose relevant addresses and commercial relationships
Prerequisites: P12-L06
Learning objectives
- Disclose relevant addresses and commercial relationships
- Disclose relevant technical roles and commercial dependencies without implying verified human identity.
Why this matters
A creator can disclose an address while omitting paid promotion, custody or control retained elsewhere. A conflict register should reveal relationships without becoming a private identity dossier.
Explanation
List material technical roles: deployer, treasury, mint authority, upgrade admin, LP holder and fee recipient, where applicable. Keep exact locators separate from asserted affiliation. A label such as “team treasury” is an issuer declaration until independent evidence supports that relation. Address disclosure does not prove beneficial ownership or all alternate control paths.
Add commercial relationships in a separate register: paid launch assistance, promotion, liquidity service, referral compensation and related-party arrangements. State the scope and who supplied the disclosure. An affiliate fee or Creator Lab participation must not change Radar’s factual measurements, timestamps or gaps. A conflict disclosure improves transparency but does not erase the conflict or validate the asset.
Prefer relevant public role information over personal details. Do not publish private names, contact information or inferred identity clusters from shared funding. Unknown affiliations remain unknown. This lesson creates no actual wallet and does not retrieve account or entitlement data.
Key terms
Role disclosure: attributed mapping from a technical locator to a purpose.
Commercial conflict: interest that may affect a party’s incentives.
Related party: asserted relationship requiring a stated evidence basis.
Independent fact lane: measurements unaffected by paid participation.
Historical example
ILLUSTRATIVE Cedar register: labelW1 is declared deployer;W2 treasury;W3 LP custody;W4 upgrade admin. ProviderQ is paid for launch assistance and a referral channel receives compensation. No real addresses or verified humans exist. FundingW1→W2 is stipulated but supplies no independent ownership proof.
Visual specifications
Deployer-flow diagram of fictional W1→W2 plus role tableW1–W4. A separate commercial-conflict lane Q/referral has no write arrow into Radar facts; unknown affiliation is visible.
Caption: Fictional role and conflict disclosure; paid participation supplies no ownership or diagnostic proof.
SPECIFICATION_ONLY — the rendered visual has not been produced or independently reviewed.
What the evidence proves
The fictional register makes stated roles and two commercial dependencies visible. It allows a reader to distinguish declared affiliation from ledger-like relation.
What the evidence does not prove
It proves no real wallets, beneficial ownership, complete control map, conflict resolution or independent diagnostic endorsement. A funding edge cannot replace affiliation evidence.
Common mistakes
Treating declared team labels as independently verified; omitting referral compensation; merging paid participation into a confidence score; exposing private people to fill technical gaps.
Practical exercise
Draft role and commercial registers for Cedar with source/evidence-state columns. Rewrite “all team wallets are independently verified and paid assistance improves Radar confidence.”
Show worked correction
Role rows W1–W4 carry issuer-declared affiliation, fictional locator and unverified human/control boundary. Commercial rows disclose provider Q launch fee and referral compensation, with scope and issuer as source. Revised statement: “The illustrative issuer declares these technical roles and commercial relationships; no independent human ownership is established. Paid assistance changes no Radar observation, confidence boundary or coverage gap.” Keep unknown alternate roles explicit rather than claiming completeness.
Checklist
- List material technical roles separately.
- Attribute affiliation and beneficial-owner claims.
- Disclose paid and referral dependencies.
- Keep private identities and commercial entitlement out of diagnostic facts.
Summary
A useful creator register attributes technical roles and commercial interests while preserving independent measurement boundaries.
Summary
- Declared affiliation is not independently observed identity.
- Disclosed conflicts remain conflicts.
- Payment cannot alter diagnostic facts.
Next lesson
P12-L08
Tools
Use the named ZECOIN tool only as an evidence-reading context. This lesson creates no tool output, account session or entitlement. Offline exercise; do not sign, deploy, approve or fund anything.
Sources & claim boundaries
- ERC20: ERC-20 standard — Token interface and allowance semantics; the standard does not establish issuer identity or safe permissions. Boundary: Mechanism documentation only; original illustrative values are stipulated, not observations. Historical records have separately frozen provenance and explicit collection gaps.
- PROXY: ERC-1967 proxy storage slots — Standardized implementation/admin slots; renouncing one role does not establish all upgrade paths disabled. Boundary: Mechanism documentation only; original illustrative values are stipulated, not observations. Historical records have separately frozen provenance and explicit collection gaps.
Evidence classifications
ILLUSTRATIVE — entirely fictional offline inputs; no current observation.
Observation date
null — no real observation
Content version
1
Review date
null
Review status
needs_review
Visual specifications
P12-L07-V01
Disclose relevant addresses and commercial relationships
Fictional role and conflict disclosure; paid participation supplies no ownership or diagnostic proof.
Deployer-flow diagram of fictional W1→W2 plus role tableW1–W4. A separate commercial-conflict lane Q/referral has no write arrow into Radar facts; unknown affiliation is visible.
Deployer-flow diagram of fictional W1→W2 plus role tableW1–W4. A separate commercial-conflict lane Q/referral has no write arrow into Radar facts; unknown affiliation is visible.
Stack observations, assumptions, gaps and conclusion at 390 px; retain full IDs and a complete text equivalent. Any wide table scrolls locally.
Prose may follow RTL; IDs, quantities and time axes remain LTR. Preserve dependency direction.
P12-L07-ILLUSTRATIVE-v1
Sources & claim boundaries
ERC20 · PRIMARY_DOCUMENTATION
ERC-20 standard
- Supported claim
- Token interface and allowance semantics; the standard does not establish issuer identity or safe permissions.
- Verification boundary
- Mechanism documentation only; original illustrative values are stipulated, not observations. Historical records have separately frozen provenance and explicit collection gaps.
- Checked at
- 2026-10-02
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20
PROXY · PRIMARY_DOCUMENTATION
ERC-1967 proxy storage slots
- Supported claim
- Standardized implementation/admin slots; renouncing one role does not establish all upgrade paths disabled.
- Verification boundary
- Mechanism documentation only; original illustrative values are stipulated, not observations. Historical records have separately frozen provenance and explicit collection gaps.
- Checked at
- 2026-10-02
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1967
Dataset provenance
id: P12-L07-ILLUSTRATIVE-v1
dataStatus: ILLUSTRATIVE
observedAt: null
source: Original offline scenario in realOrHistoricalExample
scope: Fictional stipulated labels and values. No wallet, deployment, transaction, token launch or production observation.