P06-L05 · P06 · P06-M02
Recognize shared risk factors across nominally different assets
Prerequisites: P06-L04
Learning objectives
- Recognize shared risk factors across nominally different assets
- Compute a simple paired-return correlation.
- Identify shared factors beyond asset names.
EN source master · P06-L05 · 30 minutes estimated · needs_review
Offline formative study. No wallet connection, real funds, private keys, signatures, live trade or personal portfolio inputs. Visuals are specifications. This source master remains needs_review; completing the formative exercise does not issue certification.
Why this matters
Several different asset labels may share one collateral, venue or liquidity dependency.
Explanation
Correlation is a sample association
Linear correlation compares paired deviations from their means [CORR]. For nonconstant samples, r=sum((A−meanA)(B−meanB))/sqrt(sum(A−meanA)^2×sum(B−meanB)^2). Values near+1 describe aligned supplied variation; they do not prove causation. A constant sample makes the denominator zero.
Use like periods and units
Our fictional return series A=[−1,0,+1]% and B=[−2,0,+2]% are aligned observation pairs. Price levels and returns are different inputs. Mixing timestamps or intervals destroys the paired interpretation. Three points are a demonstration, not a robust estimate.
Concentration follows dependencies too
The original desk assigns weights40%,35%,25% to A/B/C. A and B share a fictional custodian and redemption route; combined75% therefore has that operational dependency. Token count alone does not measure independent exposure. C has a separate route, but no safety is implied.
Stress is distinct from correlation
An estimated historical correlation can change with regime or simultaneous liquidity pressure. A scenario loss=sum(weight×assigned adverse return) is a declared stress, not a probability forecast. Opposing three-point samples cannot establish reliable future hedging. Record common factors, lookback and stress assumptions, then leave unmeasured future dependence UNKNOWN.
Key terms
- Paired returns: same-period changes compared together.
- Correlation: normalized sample linear association.
- Concentration: exposure sharing an asset or dependency.
- Factor: condition affecting multiple nominally distinct positions.
Historical example
ILLUSTRATIVE paired returns A=[−1,0,+1]%, B=[−2,0,+2]%, C=[+1,0,−1]%. Desk weights40/35/25%. A/B share fictional routeR. Separate stress returns A−30%, B−20%, C−5%; no scenario probability supplied.
Visual specifications
Dependency graph: A/B connect to shared routeR; C separate routeS. Pair with weighted-loss table and sample-correlation labels. Edges indicate stipulated dependency, never human ownership.
What the evidence proves
Supplied sample associations and exposure to the stipulated shared route.
What the evidence does not prove
Stable future correlation, causal influence, independent custody verification or a guaranteed hedge.
Evidence classifications
- OBSERVED: FIX-P06-L05 stipulates shared routeR for A/B.
- INFERRED:75% of assigned weight depends on R.
- UNKNOWN: future joint-return distribution.
- INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE: C reliably offsets A in stress.
Common mistakes
- Counting names as independent diversification.
- Using price-level correlation without saying so.
- Carrying a tiny-sample negative correlation into a guarantee.
Practical exercise
Calculate A/B and A/C correlations, routeR concentration and weighted stress loss. Explain one return-data limitation and one operational factor not represented by r.
Deliver calculations or annotations, claim/source table and limitations. Suggested allocation: study 12 minutes, exercise 8, correction/quiz 10; estimate subject to calibration.
Show worked correction
Means are zero. A/B numerator4, denominator sqrt(2×8)=4, r=+1. A/C numerator−2, denominator 2, r=−1. RouteR concentration40+35=75%. Stress contribution−12%,−7%,−1.25%, total−20.25%. The stress deliberately differs from the tiny historical-style fixture. Three aligned points cannot establish future dependence; a route outage is not captured by return r alone.
Formative rubric (5 points): reproducible inputs, correct method, correct result, claim-specific evidence scope, explicit limitations. Invented observation, advisory output or unsupported safety claim requires correction regardless of score.
Checklist
- Pair identical periods.
- State returns versus levels.
- Map shared dependencies.
- Separate sample association and stress.
Summary
Diversification analysis combines paired-return evidence with shared operational factors; neither asset count nor sample r ensures an offset.
Summary
- Compute a simple paired-return correlation.
- Identify shared factors beyond asset names.
Next lesson
P06-L06 after correction review.
Tools
NONE in the authoritative catalog. The supplied offline fixture/package is sufficient; no paid feature or unverified Production capability is required. Lab/certification metadata denotes downstream associations, not access gates or live awards.
Sources & claim boundaries
- [CORR] NIST — Linear correlation — Correlation describes association in paired data; no causal or future guarantee. Checked 2026-10-01; locator turn11view3.
Visual specifications
P06-L05-V01
Recognize shared risk factors across nominally different assets
ILLUSTRATIVE — fictional inputs; no signal or safety guarantee.
Dependency graph: A/B connect to shared routeR; C separate routeS. Pair with weighted-loss table and sample-correlation labels. Edges indicate stipulated dependency, never human ownership.
Dependency graph: A/B connect to shared routeR; C separate routeS. Pair with weighted-loss table and sample-correlation labels. Edges indicate stipulated dependency, never human ownership.
At 390px stack chart/table, assumptions, correction and source panel; provide complete text equivalent. Rendering pending.
RTL explanatory prose; numeric values, IDs and chronological axes stay LTR; preserve dependency directions.
FIX-P06-L05
Sources & claim boundaries
CORR · PRIMARY_DOCUMENTATION
NIST — Linear correlation
- Supported claim
- Correlation describes association in paired data; no causal or future guarantee.
- Verification boundary
- Documentation supports mechanism only; fixture values are original stipulated inputs. Historical publications remain attributed.
- Checked at
- 2026-10-01
https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/software/dataplot/refman2/auxillar/linecorr.htm
Dataset provenance
id: FIX-P06-L05
dataStatus: ILLUSTRATIVE
observedAt: null
timeBasis: T/SIM markers are fictional order, not timestamps.
source: Author-created fixture embedded in this lesson.
scope: No market observation, usable address, secret, signature or personal financial data.