Back

Correlation and concentration

P06-L05 · P06 · P06-M02

Recognize shared risk factors across nominally different assets

ILLUSTRATIVE · needs_review

Prerequisites: P06-L04

Learning objectives

  • Recognize shared risk factors across nominally different assets
  • Compute a simple paired-return correlation.
  • Identify shared factors beyond asset names.

EN source master · P06-L05 · 30 minutes estimated · needs_review

Offline formative study. No wallet connection, real funds, private keys, signatures, live trade or personal portfolio inputs. Visuals are specifications. This source master remains needs_review; completing the formative exercise does not issue certification.

Why this matters

Several different asset labels may share one collateral, venue or liquidity dependency.

Explanation

Correlation is a sample association

Linear correlation compares paired deviations from their means [CORR]. For nonconstant samples, r=sum((A−meanA)(B−meanB))/sqrt(sum(A−meanA)^2×sum(B−meanB)^2). Values near+1 describe aligned supplied variation; they do not prove causation. A constant sample makes the denominator zero.

Use like periods and units

Our fictional return series A=[−1,0,+1]% and B=[−2,0,+2]% are aligned observation pairs. Price levels and returns are different inputs. Mixing timestamps or intervals destroys the paired interpretation. Three points are a demonstration, not a robust estimate.

Concentration follows dependencies too

The original desk assigns weights40%,35%,25% to A/B/C. A and B share a fictional custodian and redemption route; combined75% therefore has that operational dependency. Token count alone does not measure independent exposure. C has a separate route, but no safety is implied.

Stress is distinct from correlation

An estimated historical correlation can change with regime or simultaneous liquidity pressure. A scenario loss=sum(weight×assigned adverse return) is a declared stress, not a probability forecast. Opposing three-point samples cannot establish reliable future hedging. Record common factors, lookback and stress assumptions, then leave unmeasured future dependence UNKNOWN.

Key terms

  • Paired returns: same-period changes compared together.
  • Correlation: normalized sample linear association.
  • Concentration: exposure sharing an asset or dependency.
  • Factor: condition affecting multiple nominally distinct positions.

Historical example

ILLUSTRATIVE paired returns A=[−1,0,+1]%, B=[−2,0,+2]%, C=[+1,0,−1]%. Desk weights40/35/25%. A/B share fictional routeR. Separate stress returns A−30%, B−20%, C−5%; no scenario probability supplied.

Visual specifications

Dependency graph: A/B connect to shared routeR; C separate routeS. Pair with weighted-loss table and sample-correlation labels. Edges indicate stipulated dependency, never human ownership.

What the evidence proves

Supplied sample associations and exposure to the stipulated shared route.

What the evidence does not prove

Stable future correlation, causal influence, independent custody verification or a guaranteed hedge.

Evidence classifications

  • OBSERVED: FIX-P06-L05 stipulates shared routeR for A/B.
  • INFERRED:75% of assigned weight depends on R.
  • UNKNOWN: future joint-return distribution.
  • INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE: C reliably offsets A in stress.

Common mistakes

  • Counting names as independent diversification.
  • Using price-level correlation without saying so.
  • Carrying a tiny-sample negative correlation into a guarantee.

Practical exercise

Calculate A/B and A/C correlations, routeR concentration and weighted stress loss. Explain one return-data limitation and one operational factor not represented by r.

Deliver calculations or annotations, claim/source table and limitations. Suggested allocation: study 12 minutes, exercise 8, correction/quiz 10; estimate subject to calibration.

Show worked correction

Means are zero. A/B numerator4, denominator sqrt(2×8)=4, r=+1. A/C numerator−2, denominator 2, r=−1. RouteR concentration40+35=75%. Stress contribution−12%,−7%,−1.25%, total−20.25%. The stress deliberately differs from the tiny historical-style fixture. Three aligned points cannot establish future dependence; a route outage is not captured by return r alone.

Formative rubric (5 points): reproducible inputs, correct method, correct result, claim-specific evidence scope, explicit limitations. Invented observation, advisory output or unsupported safety claim requires correction regardless of score.

Checklist

  • Pair identical periods.
  • State returns versus levels.
  • Map shared dependencies.
  • Separate sample association and stress.

Summary

Diversification analysis combines paired-return evidence with shared operational factors; neither asset count nor sample r ensures an offset.

Summary

  • Compute a simple paired-return correlation.
  • Identify shared factors beyond asset names.

Next lesson

P06-L06 after correction review.

Tools

NONE in the authoritative catalog. The supplied offline fixture/package is sufficient; no paid feature or unverified Production capability is required. Lab/certification metadata denotes downstream associations, not access gates or live awards.

Sources & claim boundaries

  • [CORR] NIST — Linear correlation — Correlation describes association in paired data; no causal or future guarantee. Checked 2026-10-01; locator turn11view3.

Visual specifications

P06-L05-V01

SPECIFICATION_ONLY · ILLUSTRATIVE

Recognize shared risk factors across nominally different assets

ILLUSTRATIVE — fictional inputs; no signal or safety guarantee.

Dependency graph: A/B connect to shared routeR; C separate routeS. Pair with weighted-loss table and sample-correlation labels. Edges indicate stipulated dependency, never human ownership.

Dependency graph: A/B connect to shared routeR; C separate routeS. Pair with weighted-loss table and sample-correlation labels. Edges indicate stipulated dependency, never human ownership.

At 390px stack chart/table, assumptions, correction and source panel; provide complete text equivalent. Rendering pending.

RTL explanatory prose; numeric values, IDs and chronological axes stay LTR; preserve dependency directions.

FIX-P06-L05

Sources & claim boundaries

Dataset provenance

id: FIX-P06-L05

dataStatus: ILLUSTRATIVE

observedAt: null

timeBasis: T/SIM markers are fictional order, not timestamps.

source: Author-created fixture embedded in this lesson.

scope: No market observation, usable address, secret, signature or personal financial data.

Test your reasoning

P06-L05-Q1 · What is A/B sample r?
P06-L05-Q2 · What is routeR concentration?
P06-L05-Q3 · What is weighted stress decline?
P06-L05-Q4 · Does A/C r=−1 guarantee future hedging?
P06-L05-Q5 · What if one paired series is constant?