Back

Position sizing across instruments

P06-L02 · P06 · P06-M01

Adjust scenario size for contract units fees and gap risk

ILLUSTRATIVE · needs_review

Prerequisites: P06-L01

Learning objectives

  • Adjust scenario size for contract units fees and gap risk
  • Carry instrument units through scenario sizing.
  • Compare baseline capacity with fee and gap sensitivity.

EN source master · P06-L02 · 30 minutes estimated · needs_review

Offline formative study. No wallet connection, real funds, private keys, signatures, live trade or personal portfolio inputs. Visuals are specifications. This source master remains needs_review; completing the formative exercise does not issue certification.

Why this matters

Equal displayed quantities can represent very different exposure when contract multipliers and settlement conventions differ.

Explanation

Preserve dimensional meaning

For a linear instrument, movement loss equals quantity×price movement×value factor [CME]. A spot-like fictional unit has factor1; the fictional linear contract has factor5 units per price point. Neither is a named tradable product. CME's settlement document explains why contract conventions and rounding must be checked; it does not supply this exercise's values.

Include stipulated costs

Our desk's assigned capacity is 120 units. Each linear contract has a 4-point adverse movement at factor5 plus3 units round-trip cost:23 units per contract. Whole-contract capacity is floor(120/23), not a fractional contract rounded upwards. The resulting number is a scenario solution, not a recommended position.

Stress the movement assumption

An8-point gap increases modeled contract loss to 43. The originally computed count can exceed capacity. Stop and hypothetical-fill limitations matter [CFTC]. A sizing formula only propagates assumptions; it cannot make them true.

Nonlinear conventions need another formula

For a separate fictional inverse contract, define signed settlement change for a long as q×F×(1/entry−1/exit) settlement units. It is a stipulated toy convention, not a real venue rule. Falling exit prices make that result negative. Do not multiply dollar price movement directly into settlement tokens. Real inverse specifications, collateral denomination, conversion price and rounding would need independent documentation before a real claim.

Key terms

  • Value factor: units of loss per price point per contract.
  • Round-trip cost: stipulated total opening/closing cost.
  • Whole-contract floor: greatest allowed integer within capacity.
  • Inverse convention: settlement changes use reciprocal prices.

Historical example

ILLUSTRATIVE linear desk capacity 120; adverse move4 points; factor5; cost 3/contract. Gap move8. Separate inverse toy q=2,F=100,entry100,exit80; fees excluded and explicitly unavailable. No real instrument symbol.

Visual specifications

Order-book-style teaching table mapping price movement to value factor and cost; baseline 5 contracts versus stress215 loss. Inverse reciprocal formula in separate units panel; no executable orders.

What the evidence proves

Unit-consistent calculations under the two explicitly supplied conventions.

What the evidence does not prove

Actual venue lot size, fee schedule, guaranteed stop execution or suitable personal size.

Evidence classifications

  • OBSERVED: FIX-P06-L02 stipulates factor5 and cost 3.
  • INFERRED: baseline whole-contract count 5 fits capacity 120.
  • UNKNOWN: actual venue rules and inverse fees.
  • INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE: this count is appropriate for a person's portfolio.

Common mistakes

  • Ignoring multiplier.
  • Rounding quantity upwards.
  • Reusing linear formula for inverse settlement.

Practical exercise

Compute modeled count and unused capacity, then its gap loss. Calculate the inverse toy settlement change and explain why no real sizing claim is supported.

Deliver calculations or annotations, claim/source table and limitations. Suggested allocation: study 12 minutes, exercise 8, correction/quiz 10; estimate subject to calibration.

Show worked correction

Per contract4×5+3=23; floor(120/23)=5; loss 115 and unused5. Gap per contract8×5+3=43; original count 5 loses215, exceeding capacity 95. Inverse change=2×100×(1/100−1/80)=−0.5 settlement units, excluding unknown fees. Separate denominations and undocumented venue rules prevent a real-position conclusion.

Formative rubric (5 points): reproducible inputs, correct method, correct result, claim-specific evidence scope, explicit limitations. Invented observation, advisory output or unsupported safety claim requires correction regardless of score.

Checklist

  • Carry movement, factor and settlement units.
  • Include declared costs.
  • Apply whole-lot constraints.
  • Recompute under gap stress.

Summary

Sizing is a unit-sensitive scenario calculation. Instrument conventions, costs and gaps can change its result materially.

Summary

  • Carry instrument units through scenario sizing.
  • Compare baseline capacity with fee and gap sensitivity.

Next lesson

P06-L03 after correction review.

Tools

NONE in the authoritative catalog. The supplied offline fixture/package is sufficient; no paid feature or unverified Production capability is required. Lab/certification metadata denotes downstream associations, not access gates or live awards.

Sources & claim boundaries

  • [CME] CME — Money calculations — Price change, quantity and contract value factor determine variation; rounding is contract-specific. Checked 2026-10-01; locator turn11view5.
  • [CFTC] CFTC — Trading systems advisory — Hypothetical execution, cost and stop-order limitations; no profit guarantee. Checked 2026-10-01; locator turn12view1.

Visual specifications

P06-L02-V01

SPECIFICATION_ONLY · ILLUSTRATIVE

Adjust scenario size for contract units fees and gap risk

ILLUSTRATIVE — fictional inputs; no signal or safety guarantee.

Order-book-style teaching table mapping price movement to value factor and cost; baseline 5 contracts versus stress215 loss. Inverse reciprocal formula in separate units panel; no executable orders.

Order-book-style teaching table mapping price movement to value factor and cost; baseline 5 contracts versus stress215 loss. Inverse reciprocal formula in separate units panel; no executable orders.

At 390px stack chart/table, assumptions, correction and source panel; provide complete text equivalent. Rendering pending.

RTL explanatory prose; numeric values, IDs and chronological axes stay LTR; preserve dependency directions.

FIX-P06-L02

Sources & claim boundaries

Dataset provenance

id: FIX-P06-L02

dataStatus: ILLUSTRATIVE

observedAt: null

timeBasis: T/SIM markers are fictional order, not timestamps.

source: Author-created fixture embedded in this lesson.

scope: No market observation, usable address, secret, signature or personal financial data.

Test your reasoning

P06-L02-Q1 · What is baseline loss per linear contract?
P06-L02-Q2 · What count satisfies supplied integer constraint?
P06-L02-Q3 · What is loss for original 5 contracts under gap stress?
P06-L02-Q4 · What is inverse toy result?
P06-L02-Q5 · What is missing before applying this to a real venue?