P01-L02 · P01 · P01-M01
Identify native coins versus issued tokens
Prerequisites: P01-L01
Learning objectives
- Identify native coins versus issued tokens
- Identify native assets and issued representations.
- Use network plus exact identifier rather than a ticker.
- Convert a supplied raw amount without guessing decimals.
EN source master · P01-L02 · 30 minutes estimated · needs_review
Read-only study. No wallet connection, real money, seed phrase, private key, signature or live trade. Duration is an editorial estimate; visual assets are specifications, not deployed components.
Why this matters
Two assets can share a name and symbol while having unrelated issuers or code. A ticker is a display convenience, not a unique research key.
Explanation
Start with the network's accounting
A native coin is part of a network's own accounting and fee mechanism. An issued token is represented through additional token logic and state. Ether (ETH), Ethereum's native asset, pays Ethereum execution fees [GAS]; an ERC-20 balance is described by a contract interface (ERC-20 is the Ethereum token-interface standard used here) [ERC20]. This distinction describes roles, not quality. A native coin is not automatically safer, and a token is not automatically suspect.
Identify the exact object
For an Ethereum token, retain the chain and full contract identifier. For a Solana token, retain cluster/network, mint and relevant token program. A Solana token account refers to a particular mint [SOLTOKEN]. Do not confuse a holder's token account with the mint itself.
Name, symbol and logo may be duplicated. Matching these three fields does not close the identity question. Compare the exact identifier against a suitably attributed issuer or protocol source, record that source and say what remains unverified. A claimed issuer page also needs origin checks; a screenshot of such a page is not an independent signature of authenticity.
Preserve units
Raw balances are integer units. When the supplied decimals are d, displayed units equal raw divided by 10^d. ERC-20 decimals is optional metadata [ERC20]; absence is not permission to assume 18. An exercise may stipulate decimals so arithmetic is reproducible, while a real investigation needs a source for the value.
Separate identity from unit conversion. Converting the wrong contract correctly still describes the wrong asset. Equal displayed balances under different identifiers do not become interchangeable. A representation on another network requires its own dependency analysis.
Record a classification with limits
A useful asset row includes network, role, exact identifier or native designation, symbol, decimals basis and source context. Avoid forcing a contract address onto every native coin. Where a network-specific representation exists, record it as that representation rather than silently equating it with the native balance.
Evidence-state classification
OBSERVED in the illustrative cards: network identifiers, asset labels, raw balances and supplied decimals. INFERRED: B displays 2.5 and C displays 0.025 under their own scales. UNKNOWN: absent decimals or human controllers. INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE: shared symbol or equal raw quantity establishes identical asset identity or safety.
Key terms
- Native coin: asset integral to network accounting.
- Token: issued asset represented by token state/logic.
- Mint: the Solana token-defining account, whose address identifies the token.
- Decimals: display scale for raw integer units.
Historical example
ILLUSTRATIVE. A: SIM-EVM, native SIM-ETH. B: SIM-EVM, TOKEN-RED, symbol USDX, decimals 6, raw balance 2500000. C: SIM-EVM, TOKEN-BLUE, symbol USDX, decimals 8, raw balance 2500000. D: SIM-SOL, MINT-RED, symbol USDX. Labels are intentionally invalid as real addresses.
Visual specifications
Mint comparison table: A native; B/C separate contracts; D mint. Show raw and normalized B/C amounts without merging rows. Alt: identical USDX symbols identify three different fictional assets.
What the evidence proves
Classification and arithmetic within the supplied fictional records.
What the evidence does not prove
Issuer authenticity, redemption equivalence, token safety or a live balance.
Common mistakes
- Using symbol as primary key.
- Applying a default decimals value.
- Confusing mint and holder token account.
Practical exercise
Classify A–D, compute B/C displayed amounts and test whether B/C/D are one asset. List what issuer evidence would be needed.
Submit a short evidence table and reasoning, using only the provided material. Suggested allocation: study 12 min, inspection/calculation 8 min, correction/quiz 10 min.
Show worked correction
A is the stipulated native coin. B/C are distinct issued contracts and D is a distinct mint. B=2.5 tokens; C=0.025 tokens. The common symbol supplies no equivalence proof. Need network-specific issuer identifiers and, for any representation, its documented linkage. Human control remains UNKNOWN.
Review rubric: 1 point each for exact scope, source/fixture provenance, correct reasoning, explicit limitations and safe offline handling (5 total). An invented observation or unsupported human attribution requires correction regardless of score. This is formative feedback, not certification.
Checklist
- Record network.
- Record native role or exact contract/mint.
- Source decimals.
- Keep similarly named assets separate.
Summary
Two assets can share a name and symbol while having unrelated issuers or code. A ticker is a display convenience, not a unique research key. The supplied material supports classification and arithmetic within the supplied fictional records. It does not establish issuer authenticity, redemption equivalence, token safety or a live balance.
Summary
- Identify native assets and issued representations.
- Use network plus exact identifier rather than a ticker.
- Convert a supplied raw amount without guessing decimals.
Next lesson
P01-L03 after reviewing this exercise and its prerequisites.
Tools
NONE. The authoritative catalog requires no product access for this lesson. Use the frozen/offline material.
Sources & claim boundaries
- [ERC20] ERC-20 token standard — Token balances, optional decimals, transfer, approval and allowance interfaces. Checked 2026-10-01.
- [SOLTOKEN] Solana token accounts — Mint reference and token-owner authority are distinct from program owner. Checked 2026-10-01.
- [GAS] Ethereum gas and fees — Gas used times effective price and included failure costs. Checked 2026-10-01.
Synthetic values are author-created exercise inputs. Historical values, if any, must use the linked dataset and its narrower provenance. Source inspection is not independent editorial acceptance.
Visual specifications
P01-L02-V01
Identify native coins versus issued tokens
Illustrative teaching data; not a live screen
Mint comparison table: A native; B/C separate contracts; D mint. Show raw and normalized B/C amounts without merging rows. Alt: identical USDX symbols identify three different fictional assets.
identical USDX symbols identify three different fictional assets.
390px stacked rows with complete text equivalent; 768px/desktop render acceptance pending
RTL prose; identifiers and number units remain LTR; preserve factual arrow directions
FIX-P01-L02
Sources & claim boundaries
ERC20 · PRIMARY_DOCUMENTATION
ERC-20 token standard
- Supported claim
- Token balances, optional decimals, transfer, approval and allowance interfaces.
- Verification boundary
- Primary page inspected for the stated mechanism or attributed publication; does not authenticate illustrative data.
- Checked at
- 2026-10-01
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20
SOLTOKEN · PRIMARY_DOCUMENTATION
Solana token accounts
- Supported claim
- Mint reference and token-owner authority are distinct from program owner.
- Verification boundary
- Primary page inspected for the stated mechanism or attributed publication; does not authenticate illustrative data.
- Checked at
- 2026-10-01
https://solana.com/docs/tokens/basics/create-token-account
GAS · PRIMARY_DOCUMENTATION
Ethereum gas and fees
- Supported claim
- Gas used times effective price and included failure costs.
- Verification boundary
- Primary page inspected for the stated mechanism or attributed publication; does not authenticate illustrative data.
- Checked at
- 2026-10-01
https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/gas/
Dataset provenance
id: FIX-P01-L02
dataStatus: ILLUSTRATIVE
source: Original teaching fixture embedded below; not externally observed
observedAt: null
timeBasis: SIM/T markers are fictional; no real timestamp or chain observation
scope: Invalid training labels; no usable wallet, key or signature